On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 11:12:21AM +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > Hi All, > > On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 08:14:38PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 06:24:44PM +0300, Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote: > > > Control: severity -1 serious > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 01:21PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > > > Nine months later there's no progress, let's remove? > > > > > > Agreed. > > > > > > Raising the severity to serious to remove from testing, and then I will > > > request for removal. > > > > Now that offlineimap3 is available in experimental, let's go ahead with > > removal > > of src:offlineimap? > > I have uploaded offlineimap3 to unstable but will not migrate untill we > have 'python3-imaplib2' in testing, which is blocked by #937831, which is > again blocked by this #937184. > > Can we go ahead with this removal please? I can then add a dummy > transitional package so that users of offlineimap can upgrade to > offlineimap3 with Bullseye. > > Since I have the ITA on offlineimap, do I file the RM bug or that needs > to be done by Ilias ?
Or on second thought, will it be easier if I upload an offlineimap upload marking the binary package as dummy transitional package instead of going through RM and then NEW ? -- Regards Sudip
