On Sun, 2022-02-13 at 18:06 -0800, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > Hi Ben, > > Thanks for detecting and reporting the build errors. > I'm a bit confused as to how this is "grave", though -- I would have > classified it as merely "serious" as for, e.g., 970258 and 995134.
The current kernel version in unstable (and now also in testing) is 5.16. For those who don't choose another kernel version, this incompatibility "makes the package in question unusable". > For upstream, we went with a slightly different patch owing to the > unreliability of the linux version macros due to distros backporting many > patches -- > https://github.com/openafs/openafs/commit/3daa6e97330d23ae46c4389e4041c61c1a1d76d9 [...] That's great, feature testing is the right way to do this. I only wrote a version check because I didn't notice OpenAFS had the infrastructure for feature testing. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
