On 9/18/23 13:03, Bo YU wrote:
Source: ceph
Followup-For: Bug #1037602
Tags: patch
User: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: riscv64
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
I found these commits that was trying to fix the issue but it looks like
they not done yet. I can confrim the attached patch can fix the issue.
https://salsa.debian.org/ceph-team/ceph/-/commit/9104dcb08ce6e86f4b2f33286938c6a90f659471
https://salsa.debian.org/ceph-team/ceph/-/commit/9cc4c414c1729b6a5b101c46cdfea4ab32f179f3
Or upgrade to 18.1.2 as you have done on salsa, but this maybe cost more
time to finish.
The reason I am ccing riscv mail list is that the ceph package is a very
key package and now it was a blocker for riscv64 official rebootstrap
from my view.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ceph
So could you apply it or upgrade to new version at your next upload?
Hi,
I tried your patch, and it's not enough, the package continues to FTBFS.
Should it be applied on top of my commits that you linked above?
Also, you might have missed that I prepared the next version in the
debian/experimental branch. The debian/unstable only has the merge of
upstream tarball, nothing more, so don't use that one. It builds a lot
more stuff, but then it also FTBFS. Note that the upstream package
prepared for Ubuntu also FTBFS.
I really would love to receive help here, packaging version 18, because
even reading the failing cmake logs is hard for me...
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
