On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 09:47:10AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 02:39:49PM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
> > Source: ola
> > Version: 0.10.9.nojsmin-4
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: patch pending sid trixie
> > Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
> > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: time-t
> >
> > NOTICE: these changes must not be uploaded to unstable yet!
> >
> > Dear maintainer,
> >
> > As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit
> > architectures in 2038 and beyond
> > (https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/64bit-time), we have identified
> > ola as a source package shipping runtime libraries whose ABI
> > either is affected by the change in size of time_t, or could not be
> > analyzed via abi-compliance-checker (and therefore to be on the safe
> > side we assume is affected).
>
> Would it make sense for me to contact upstream and ask if they do
> certain things? They're quite knowledgeable and might know.
>
> If not, then no worries, but I thought I'd ask.
nvm, just read the d-d-a mail :-)
--
w@uter.{be,co.za}
wouter@{grep.be,fosdem.org,debian.org}
I will have a Tin-Actinium-Potassium mixture, thanks.
