> Well, we appear to have two options. We can (1) leave the development > release in an unreadable directory, as it is at present; or (2) move the > development release back into a readable directory, making it clear that > it's still under development. > > Personally, I prefer (2). I don't want to make the development release > inaccessible or even hard to get. I want to make sure that everyone (who > knows what they're getting into!) can get it and install it. The current > situation doesn't allow that, as a number of people have complained about > on debian-user. > > I'll give people another day or so to comment on this. If there are no > serious objections during this time, I'm going to move the release back > into /debian. > > I think using a code name for the release is the best idea; I'll leave > thinking of one to the creative element of the Debian Project. :)
Ian, if you do decide to do number 2, could you please give us a little notice by posting to devel beforehand? I just dont want to have to delete and re-mirror the 1.0 stuff (as well as the other mirrors who are using a 2nd mirror to get 1.0 currently). We can just manually mv the debian-1.0 dir back and it wont delete it... Thanks :) ...Karl -- ________________________ | PO Box 828 Office: (09)316-3036 Fax: (09)381-3909 |OWER INTERNET SERVICES Canning Bridge After Hours: 015-779-828 WA, 6153 Sales Support: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet Service Providers and Networking Solutions