>>"erik" == erik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: erik> BTW, the rant has been a long time coming - this just keyed it.
The rant has been a long time coming. And then it comes forth, and the one lone specific amidst all the confused vituperative outpouring happens to be patently false. A long message full of unsubstantiated conspiracy theories. I see why you used the word rant: ====================================================================== >From Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913) [web1913]: Rant \Rant\, v. i. [imp. & p. p. {Ranted}; p. pr. & vb. n. {Ranting}.] [OD. ranten, randen, to dote, to be enraged.] To rave in violent, high-sounding, or extravagant language, without dignity of thought; to be noisy, boisterous, and bombastic in talk or declamation; ====================================================================== "without dignity of thought". Seems an apt description. manoj -- Lady, lady, should you meet One whose ways are all discreet, One who murmurs that his wife Is the lodestar of his life, One who keeps assuring you That he never was untrue, Never loved another one... Lady, lady, better run! Dorothy Parker, "Social Note" Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/> 1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]