[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hamish Moffatt)  wrote on 25.12.00 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 08:43:51PM -0500, Joseph Carter wrote:
> > I have a comment:  NO WAY IN HELL.  The day that we start rejecting DUL
> > posts is the day that several people leave the project, me included.  How
> > many ISPs these days route mail worth a damn?
>
> :-) Joseph you make it too easy.
>
> You never did tell us why you can't arrange a proper smarthost,
> such as a debian.org machine with an ssh tunnel.

Just tested that. ssh to master, telnet to localhost smtp, it was quite  
willing to relay mail with a non-local envelope. (And left enough clues in  
the header to track who did that just in case it ever becomes necessary.)

Now if someone was to send much mail that way, I expect checking with the  
admins in advance might be a good idea, but for low volume (and for  
contents where the association with Debian in the mail headers won't be a  
problem) this seems like an easy way to do it.

For automated usage, I expect one would prefer something like netcat to  
telnet, though :-)

MfG Kai


Reply via email to