i have libssl & openssh 2.5.2p2 for potato at http://people.debian.org/~ieure/potato_ssh
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Russell Coker wrote: > > Currently there are two usable repositories of Potato packages. There's a > repository of kernel-related packages to run 2.4.x kernels on Potato, and > there's a repository of LDAP related packages and other things that Wichert > is maintaining. > > Both of these are good work, but even combined they don't provide what I > consider to be adequate support for Potato. > > I would like a version of Potato that is not entirely frozen. It should have > updates not only for security reasons but also for addition of new programs, > and for adding new programs which add significant functionality and don't > break things (such as Wichert's LDAP packages). > > To manage this fully through the Debian system we will need support in the > BTS for reporting bugs to different people depending on the package version. > Is this possible? > > Also we need space to maintain the packages (they shouldn't be THAT big). > The aim should be that the maintainer of the woody version should not need to > be involved in the backports (unless they want to be involved). > > I am willing to be involved in back-porting packages (there's many things > that I back-port for my own use and should share). > > Also we have to consider the long-term view of this. I would like to see > back-ports to woody being done in a year's time... > >