On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 04:38:37PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 10:06:39PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > > > Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 07:50:15PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > > [...] > > > > If there are RC bugs to packages that 'release-status-sarge' depends > > > > on, it won't go to testing... > > > > > > Of course it would, unless it had a versioned dependency that could > > > not be met. And how would you know in which version the bug would be > > > fixed? > > > > 'release-status-sarge' is just a package to monitor the work to be done > > to have a stable release. > > > > It does not matter to know in which version the bug will be fixed. What > > I want for sarge is emacs21 ( >= 21.2 ) so if every RC bugs are closed > > with 21.3 or 21.4, the dependency >=21.2 is ok. > > And what if the version in testing has an RC bug? "release-status-sarge" > says everything is OK.
Do we even know which packages in sarge have RC bugs? The last time I looked when you close a bug with an upload to sid it closes it entirely still. So we don't really have a good idea of how many RC bugs exist in sarge, only how many are in sid. Chris