On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 07:37:03AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: > > Runs spamc twice. Usually it won't matter, but with higher traffic, the load > > will increase for obvious reasons... > > spamc isn't run twice. exiscan-acl *can* run the mail through SA as a > test. It doesn't /have/ to. So if one is using sa-exim one just does not > have exiscan-acl check SA.
That's not how I interpreted what you said: > It's generally accepted that for robust handling of Spam SA-Exim is the > better route. For simple handling as well as virus scanning Exiscan-ACL > is the better route. Lots of people just use both. I thought you meant both as in both Exiscan-ACL and SA-Exim. -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness.