* Peter Busser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031104 13:55]:
> You didn't touch the other facts in the list, because you know you don't have
> any proof to easily dismiss them. You would be my hero if you succeeded in
> improving on PaX. But in all honesty, exec-shield does not do that I'm afraid.
> In fact, there is simply no technical reason whatsoever for exec-shield to
> exist at all. None.

you seem to suffer from an accute case of hybris. i feel you are
in the position to bring proof, if you disagree with ingo. He
seems to have thought about the issue a minute or two and
dislpayed some skill in the area allready. 


Reply via email to