-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> On Dec 19, Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> If in the future glibc decides to choose some other implementation >> >> for shm_open(), then it has no reason to stay. >> > But it has no reason to go away either, since there are many other uses >> > too for a tmpfs. >> There are many uses for an ext3fs, but that doesn't mean we only have >> one ext3 filesystem. What exactly is your reasoning here? > That tmpfs will not be removed from the kernel just because shm_open() > will switch to a different implementation. Of course. But if that happened there would be no reason to keep /dev/shm mounted; you would need to use an alternate location. - -- Roger Leigh Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/ Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/ GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD8DBQFDpwgzVcFcaSW/uEgRAqwyAJ9YqGshjfse9RYlNuxti7iz3p15qQCfROXn RskcNKCR5yffZlelQTPyJeU= =JEPf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]