Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Any other defenders of /lib/run? Of /run?
/run makes much more sense to me. /lib/run just seems unbearably ugly, not to mention that it would be kind of nice to have a read-only /lib be a possibility for a variety of reasons (yes, I know, module dependencies make this hard). Perhaps this is a bad idea (or perhaps this is even how it's already done), but given the very limited number of things that would have to use /run, would it be possible to write them all to use /var/run if it's available and only if it's not, fall back on /run? That way, /run could be created during the boot process, then moved to /var/run and removed again once /var is available, making it a transient aspect of the boot process and not hanging around as a new top-level directory. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
