On Saturday 17 March 2007 09.29:10 Peter Samuelson wrote: > "x86=64" would have been > amusing too. Is it a veiled Commodore 64 reference, or is it > quoted-printable?
Not to speak of broken mime decoders that would just display x86d.
I'd rather say it's to do something with Georg Orwell. If 2+2=5, then we
can also have 86=64, I don't know what happens to the x, though. Hmm. Or
we could just call the architecture x=0.744
cheers
-- vbi
--
Wer A sagt, der muß nicht B sagen. Er kann auch erkennen, daß A
falsch war.
-- Bertold Brecht
pgpeHazG8KJK1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
