-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/07/08 15:34, Luk Claes wrote: > Ron Johnson wrote: >> On 04/07/08 13:20, Luk Claes wrote: >>> Peter Jordan wrote: >>>> Luk Claes, 04/07/08 20:05: >>>> >>>>> Peter Jordan wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>> Hi >>>>> >>>>>> why are the keyrings of debian-multimedia.org and debian backports not >>>>>> in the official repository of debian? >>>>>> >>>>>> At the moment you have to install untrusted keyrings before you can use >>>>>> these repositories. >>>>> Because they are no official Debian services (yet?). >>>>> >>>> but the repositories does not need to be official debian services, only >>>> the keyrings should be available over the official debian repository. >>> No, as that would imply that they are or at least will be official >>> Debian services and open the door for every archive provider to ask for >>> adding their key... >> Governments need silly all-encompassing rule sets to appear fair. >> Debian doesn't. IOW, adding debian-multimedia-keyring and >> debian-backports-keyring doesn't mean that you've got to add every >> other unofficial archive keyring, even though that archive's owner >> screams "that's not fair!". > Indeed, so we don't need to add these neither even though you scream > it's unfair :-)
Actually, OP and I are not screaming that not add the 2 keyring packages is unfair. > There has to be a line somewhere and the current line makes sense to > everyone, so I don't need we will change it... As is your prerogative... - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA We want... a Shrubbery!! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH+sFrS9HxQb37XmcRArDCAJ0XboaceDYoLxknkV0ZmHx8JYXujACfQRKs H1FY+0KuHGQvVGs3ScG6ukY= =bLSm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]