On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 01:07:56AM -0700, Paul Hardy wrote: > However, the original BDF version can contain ASCII comments that are > not preserved in the PCF version. These comments often contain > information such as author, copyright, and licensing information. > With the BDF versions discarded, that information is lost -- there is > no round-trip conversion from BDF to PCF to BDF.
My first thought: Could BDF be considered a source format for PCF? The logical consequence would be to ship BDF in the source package, and to convert it to PCF when the font package is built. Cheers, Richard -- __ _ |_) /| Richard Atterer | GnuPG key: 888354F7 | \/¯| http://atterer.net | 08A9 7B7D 3D13 3EF2 3D25 D157 79E6 F6DC 8883 54F7 ¯ '` ¯ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org