On 04/05/2011 05:21 AM, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: > On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 12:09:42PM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 09:10:47AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: >>> ]] Stanislav Maslovski >>> d-i doesn't use ifupdown, it uses netcfg. >> >> Hm, okay, I was pretty sure J.M. at some point mentioned replacing >> ifupdown _in the installer_ with network manager… Then, the current >> limitations of the installer are not even related to ifupdown at all. >> That is a good news. > > Yes, he did. Here: > > "On my personal wishlist for wheezy is d-i actually calling NM behind the > scenes to configure the network, instead of ifupdown. I'll definitely > try to find time to hack on this. > -- > .''. Josselin Mouette"
Splitting hairs. netcfg establishes an initially configured /etc/network/interfaces to make ifupdown work when the user boots into their freshly configured system. I think it's clear enough by context this is what Joss means to change to a purely NM solution. Ben -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d9afeb8.1060...@sanctuary.nslug.ns.ca