On Sunday, March 18, 2012 13:23:13, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 03/18/2012 09:50 PM, Chris Knadle wrote: > > Some public discussion with the repository maintainer about this might be > > warranted. Such would be worhwhile even if the outcome is not what is > > desired, because at least then there will be a public record of where > > d-m.o and d.o stand. > > debian-devel@lists.debian.org is a public mailing list. He's free to > join the list and contribute to this thread!
Rediculous. d-m.o has a public mailing list to discuss issues concerning the repo. What you're suggesting is that someone should to go tell Christian that there's this two-week old thread on debian-devel called "d-m.o considered harmful" and he's supposed to jump into that, where he can expect to enter a hostile enviornment*. I really doubt that's going to occur. * [I'm not saying [debian-devel] is hostile, just that it should be expected that it would be in this speicific instance given the subject of the thread.] -- Chris -- Chris Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201203181648.24558.chris.kna...@coredump.us
