On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 06:49:45PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 01:08:31AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > Now, I may add, I have no will to discuss it with you > > anyway, after reading you impose on my your > > partitioning scheme, and would like me to use my > > computer the way *YOU* think is best. That is, by > > the way, the same attitude systemd upstream has. > > Yes, you can do with *YOUR* computer whatever you want. You can paint > it pink and attach nice flower stickers onto it. But that doesn't mean > upstream or distribution developers always have to keep their software > in the most flexible way so it would fit everybody. It's simply not > feasible and wastes time and efforts sometimes.
Possibly. Now if someone wants to fork the particular bits of upstream software so making use of a separate /usr is still possible, even if you think it's totally useless, are you going to stop them. That's what this thread is about, really. > It's pointless to put so much effort to support every single use > case. Why aren't we all using Windows, then? [...] -- Copyshops should do vouchers. So that next time some bureaucracy requires you to mail a form in triplicate, you can mail it just once, add a voucher, and save on postage. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121129142421.gb...@grep.be
