On 04/04/2013 12:05 PM, ian_br...@fastmail.net wrote: > Do you think there is any way that the relevance of posts to a bug > report can be determined, without reference to the context in which they > appear, *all the preceeding discussion*?
So far as I can see, nobody doubts your intentions. But you appear to overestimate the time a spam reviewer commits per message to make that snap judgement "spam or nonspam?" ... *click* You've been told why your message had the appearance of spam. I concur with the reasons given by others so far. Nobody is arguing this was anything more than a "false positive", nor should you waste any further effort trying to justify why it wasn't spam nor why any careful reader would see it as anything but nonspam. Just take care in future that the style of communications you used triggered someone's "wetware spam filter" with a false positive. Learn and move on. Ben -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/515da033.5080...@debian.org