On 6 April 2013 at 21:55, Julian Gilbey wrote: | > R> print(todo[ order(todo[,2]), ], row.names=FALSE) | > pkg maint | > r-cran-erm j...@debian.org | > r-cran-raschsampler j...@debian.org | | I uploaded these to unstable on Friday lunchtime, and they were | accepted into unstable on Friday afternoon; I'm unclear why they are | still in your list? Did I do something wrong? | | Oh yes, I clearly did. Even though I built it in a chroot with | r-base-dev 3.0.0-2 installed, I forgot to update the Depends lines in | the control files. | | So something doesn't make sense somewhere: if my package doesn't care | which version of R it's building against, but R itself cares, then | surely there should be some way of querying r-base-dev during the
Dunno -- we only have one r-base-core / r-base-dev. I think if you had updated you pbuilder chroot, you would have gotten the new R -- satisfying both the Depends you had, and the Depends you should have had. | build process to enquire which version is required? It is almost | certainly too late to do anything about this for wheezy, but it would | be good to think about doing something for wheezy+1. Ideally, this | would be by creating a misc substvar so that instead of having to | specify the version of r-base-core in the Depends: field, it could be | specified just as ${misc:Depends} and then filled in automatically. If someone could contribute this... | Anyway, I'm rebuilding them now with the dependencies updated to | 3.0.0-2. Thanks. Dirk -- Dirk Eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20832.49579.180499.982...@max.nulle.part