On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 04:29:08PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 07:52:33PM +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > > I don't really understand it myself as server packages and their > > dependencies tend to be stable and I tend to want the latest versions of > > dovecot, unbound etc.. > > > > However perhaps there is a divide here between servers which want longer > > support for few packages and desktops which want stable but secure yet > > as featureful as is sensible desktops. > > I think you have a very valid point here. I kind of doubt many people would > like to run on a five year old desktop. >
Stats seem to disagree: http://marketshare.hitslink.com/operating-system-market-share.aspx?qprid=11&qpcustomb=0 Neil --
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
