Hi there, Olav, thanks for contributing to the discussion, On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 01:40:55PM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: > I don't see this happening, at all. When the GNOME release team is asked > for a solution we make *concrete* decisions: use X, or Y or maybe try > and support both. If you want to influence these decisions, I want > something more than to a choice between something greatly supported > (logind) vs something abandoned (ConsoleKit).
So, I have a mild problem with framing the problem this way, when the systemd maintainers position (which is perfectly fair) is: from Tollef Fog Heen <tfh...@err.no> (m261smjxwi....@rahvafeir.err.no) > I'm not aware of it being argued anywhere that you can pick and choose random > components and they would work fine with any other init system. This means by adopting logind, we should switch init over to systemd, otherwise a major package is using another major package in an unsupported configuration (or at least in a way that the maintainer doesn't wish to support) Since the project (on the whole) is fairly divided, I don't think we should trivialize this to "actively developed" vs "cruft" at this stage. Much love, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte <paul...@debian.org> : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
