Perhaps before this thread spirals out of control I should re-iterate that what I said was cgroups doesn't pass the worth-it barrier for me and not that they have NO value.
I also mentioned pgroups for those that do want this functionality but also want portability and not bugs in daemons on one system but not another increasing forking, reducing eyefall, collaboration etc. and perhaps want a simpler solution. The benefit that Linux and even firefox etc. has gained from OpenBSD's practically paranoid bug fixing as well as finding the bugs for all the platforms it's userland still runs on especially in compiler tools should be realised and not underestimated. To some degree it will be true for debians HURD and is it kfreebsd too. So I don't get the holding Linux back rubbish especially when it is often based on superficial arguments that carry little weight, atleast in my eyes. Isolating Linux would hold it back and make it a flakier system in my eyes. -- _______________________________________________________________________ 'Write programs that do one thing and do it well. Write programs to work together. Write programs to handle text streams, because that is a universal interface' (Doug McIlroy) In Other Words - Don't design like polkit or systemd _______________________________________________________________________ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/924308.73795...@smtp129.mail.ir2.yahoo.com