Hey Adrian, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> writes:
> That's correct. However, the problem with kFreeBSD is that I - as a > package maintainer - have to invest extra time to make sure my > packages don't FTBFS on these architectures as otherwise my packages > wouldn't be allowed to migrate to testing. Time which I rather invest > into more important packaging work. If you are that concerned about the maintenance burden, I am happy to say OpenRC packagers are willing to help in this situation for any OpenRC related issues. Just bug us. On kFreeBSD, IMHO, diversity is quite a good thing, even from a packager maintainer PoV. Making your package portable in the correct way (say, not temperary conditional block hacks) is generally good for its rubostness. Implicit assumptions to a single environment ease our tasks in the short run, but accumulate and exploit the health of the package in the long run. Cheers, Benda -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/86a9dhs71i.fsf...@moguhome00.in.awa.tohoku.ac.jp
