+++ Didier 'OdyX' Raboud [2014-10-13 17:33 +0200]: > I really don't buy the argument that "the GR proposal was too quiet to > be noticed by 6+ people". I mean: the proposition happened to be in the > middle of the post-TC decision wave, on the mailing lists where it > belonged. The people who cared about the whole "default init for Debian" > question _were_ following and contributing to these various lists. I'm > therefore claiming that the people who missed the GR proposal were not > sufficiently interested (otherwise they would've been subscribed to > either -vote or -project, where these proposals belong).
I might well have supported a GR (depending exactly what it said), but I'm not on -vote or -project (yes, I probably should be), so I didn't notice that one was proposed. (I was also very busy trying to do actual work). I was a little surprised that all that angst failed to generate a GR. Turn out that in fact it did. > Doing this now despite the fact that the GR didn't reach its 6 seconds, > 7 months ago, will lead to an incredibly bigger waste of time, just when > we're about to freeze testing. > > The GR train passed… At this point I'm inclined to agree. I'm just pointing out that interested people, who are moderately well-involved, really did miss that a GR was attempted. Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http://wookware.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141014001348.gk19...@stoneboat.aleph1.co.uk