Simon Richter <s...@debian.org> writes: > With my embedded hat on, it would be nice if there was an easy way to > drop this extra dependency, as it means a lot of essentially dead code > loaded on systems that don't use systemd.
Like others, I'd be happy to support that as a build profile or build option or something. As upstream, it's already easy to tell all my code that's systemd-aware to stub out that stuff if wanted. But, as you say, I think it's unlikely that this is really the low-hanging fruit for very resource-constrained embedded environments. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/878ufupn32....@hope.eyrie.org
