On Mon, 04 Jun 2018, Ian Jackson wrote: > Dmitry Smirnov writes ("concerns about Salsa"): > > Imagine my surprise when I've found that Salsa is not using our own > > GitLab package at all. > > Salsa is hardly the first Debian production service to not be running > the packaged version of its primary application, and it won't be the > last. ftp.debian.org isn't running the packaged version of dak. > > Even my own git.dgit.d.o isn't running the packaged version of > dgit-infrastructure; it executes out of a git clone. (I took the > trouble to implement `dgit clone-dgit-repos-server' and the > corresponding server end so make sure that the source code for the > server is always public.) > > > I would understand if there were no choice but Salsa admins clearly > > chosen to discard GitLab package in favor of vendor binaries > > However, I hope it's not running vendor-provided binaries. That would > be quite poor IMO and a big departure from our normal practice. Are > you sure that that is the case ? We use git. https://salsa.debian.org/salsa/ansible
Alex