Hi, On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 11:07 AM Andreas Metzler <ametz...@bebt.de> wrote: > > Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Tue, 2018-11-06 at 15:00:03 +0000, Matthew Vernon wrote: > [...] > > >> that at least a MR is something I should have expected as a package > >> maintainer, not just commits to master? > cu And- plan for the weekend: move everything except qa away from > Debian/group - reas
Not sure exactly what the commit was but: * maybe that person spent time trying to help or trying to fix something that wasn't clean. Maybe the better way to go is to be thankful for people trying to help your package being better, even if expressed not exactly the way you wanted. * in a community, people trying to help may result in commits that you will have to revert but I'm not sure why all this fuss. Honestly, I've made a bunch of MR, some worked fine, some were totally ignored or just made people angry (for reasons I don't really get), not sure if it would have changed anything if I would have pushed to master directly. * in an even broader sense, it's always a best practice to pull your repo before working on it and not to keep local changes (at least in case you are not awake enough and you do `rm -f ~/`+ bad copy/paste resulting in a wipe of your homedir!) Maybe we should have kept collab-maint as group name as it says on the package "Collaborative maintenance"? We can't really change that now! :) But anyway, I'm still convinced that playing as a global team is better than doing something separately and be mad when someone is trying to help. Joseph
