On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 04:22:49PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote: > > Why Not Make this Change > > ======================== > > I would use dh for any new package and converting trivial packages is... > trivial. However converting a package with a more convoluted rules files > will take humanpower. While it may be justified to convert a mildly > complex rules file on a package that has some activity, I don't think I > would invest those resources to convert a package that's been working > for years without anyone touching it's rules files.
Can you give an example for a package that has a non-dh rules file "working for years" that gives as a result a package with no lintian warnings without changing this d/rules file? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de