Thanks for all the comments on the draft service architecture I posted in late July. [1] I have made a v2, incorporating the various helpful suggestions, and the information from the thread.
Some respondents raised archive integrity concerns. It seemed best to address those more formally, and in a more structured way, than as a mailing list subthreads. Accordingly, v2 of my proposal has a formal risk assessment, in a format loosely borrowed from health and safety management. I think I have captured in the risk assessment all the risks mentioned in the thread, but I may well have missed something. Please let me know if you think there is anything which is not covered. Also please let me know if any of my analysis seems wrong. Please find an introduction, and detailed documentation, here: https://people.debian.org/~iwj/tag2upload/2019-08-20/ Thanks, Ian. [1] This message and the subsequent thread: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2019/07/msg00501.html -- Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own. If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.