Hi, I think that every published versions must have an entry in d/changelog
If unstable version follows some experimental ones, then I prefer to have the full entries. This can also help to debug when an other package has a ">= exp-version" Le 3 décembre 2019 08:21:12 GMT+01:00, Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org> a écrit : >Paolo Greppi <paolo.gre...@libpf.com> writes: > >> What is the best approach for d/changelog when releasing a package to >> unstable after it has been through a few iterations to experimental ? > >> It would seem that the right thing to do is to keep all experimental >> changelog entries, and add a new one for unstable. > >This is the typical practice, including all the intermediate >experiments >or false starts in experimental. > >I sympathize with wanting to clean up some of that, but as a project we >generally have decided to live with that. Most users don't read the >full >changelog anyway (user-visible notes should be in NEWS instead, which >are >shown to more people via apt-listchanges), and removing versions from >the >history has bad effects on the bug-tracking system, historical >archives, >etc. > >-- >Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) ><https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec Courriel K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté.
