On 16.03.20 12:29, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Mar 16, Simon McVittie <s...@debian.org> wrote: > >> `busybox vi` is rather limited, but is reasonable as an editor of last >> resort; busybox is smaller than either nano or vim-tiny; full systems > Agreed: this is a very good idea since I really think that every default > install must provide something enough vi-compatible.
I'd disagree. vi is very newbie unfriendly. OTOH I expect people that know how to navigate vi to be able to `apt install vi` without any problem. *t