>>> The only reason right now is because it's the name used by upstream. I >>> choose to keep the current name and mention DoH in the description to >>> help search. >>> >>> I plan to ask upstream author if they intend to support DoT in the >>> future then the name makes a little more sense. Otherwise if they can >>> change the name to nss-https or something else to avoid confusion. >> Would it make sense to resolve that with upstream before introducing this to >> Debian? It would save a trip through New and the confusion inherent in >> package name instability.
Hi, I opened an issue upstream on https://github.com/dimkr/nss-tls/issues/55. I hope I am not too enthusiast! Adrien