On 2021-04-20 12:44, Adrian Bunk wrote:
A single person being able to block consensus of basically everyone
else
feels like opening up the process to unconstructive behavior.
A single person whom we trust to upload anything to our archive.[1]
If the person thinks there is something left that should be discussed
then there is no consensus, and if a DD is just trying to sabotage
random things in Debian then GR discussion periods are not my biggest
worry.
I mean that we have unilateral access possibilities to the archive is
kinda bad as well. But there's much less cost to distracting a vote
process and be obstructionist than it is to upload a compromised
package. :)
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
