Kentaro Hayashi <ken...@xdump.org> writes: > What do you think about it?
> 1. We should use +dfsg-1 style > 2. We should use +dfsgN-1 style > 3. We should use +dfsg.N-1 style > 4. Other I would start with +dfsg-1 because it's fairly rare to have to iterate on the repackaging. You can then switch to +dfsgN-1 with the second and subsequent repackagings if needed. (Although if I knew in advance I would probably need to iterate, I'd start with +dfsgN-1.) There's an argument for consistency to always use +dfsgN-1, I guess, but I don't think it matters enough to bother. I would not use +dfsg.N-1. It's not consistent with the other places where we add suffixes, such as backporting and stable updates. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
