On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 09:18:07AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > I would hate to entirely lose the quality review that we get via NEW, but > I wonder if we could regain many those benefits by setting up some sort of > peer review system for new packages that is less formal and less > bottlenecked on a single team than the current NEW processing setup. What do you think, would it be more or less staffed than the current RFS review process?
-- WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
