On 2022-05-28 10:41:34 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2022-05-28 01:27:13 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > On 2022-05-27 12:34:26 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: [...] > > > That's needed for Bluetooth audio, *if* you are using Pipewire for audio, > > > which (as a distribution) we are not yet aiming to do. It isn't needed > > > (or useful) if you are only using Pipewire as a video multiplexer. > > > > The issue appeared automatically with the upgrade of the vlc package. > > > > > pipewire-pulse should probably have a Recommends on libspa-0.2-bluetooth, > > > if people consider Bluetooth audio to be sufficiently important to > > > justify that (of course, every critical feature for one user is considered > > > "bloat" by someone else, so we can't win). pipewire probably shouldn't, > > > until such time as we are ready to recommend Pipewire as a replacement > > > for PulseAudio. > > > > So why did Sebastian Ramacher reassign bug 1011035 to pipewire? > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1011035#22 > > If pipewire-pulse is the better place for this relationship, feel free > to reassign it.
My comment was on "until such time as we are ready to recommend Pipewire as a replacement for PulseAudio". If Debian is not ready to use Pipewire as a replacement for PulseAudio, then VLC shouldn't try to use Pipewire by default instead of PulseAudio. So that would be a bug in VLC. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)