On Sun, 2022-08-07 at 08:04 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Matt Barry <m...@hazelmollusk.org> writes: > > > I'm not really opposed to using asdf-vm if that prevents genuine > > ambiguity. Are any of these packages a) packaged for Debian, b) > > provide > > a binary called 'asdf'? > > python-asdf, cl-asdf, and asdftool are all packaged for Debian. None > of > them so far as I can tell produce a binary called asdf, but cl-asdf > does > have an info page named asdf, so there's some potential for confusion > there. (cl-asdf and python-asdf narrowly avoid having a conflict > over > info pages already.)
Thanks, that's good to know; I think that at the very least naming this package asdf-vm makes sense. Cheers, Matt