Hi,
Am 01.09.22 um 22:18 schrieb Paul Gevers:
On 01-09-2022 21:10, Rene Engelhard wrote:
This either should be ignored (like for bullseye) or downgrade, imho,
but I didn't do it myself. I don't think there's anything actionable
here...
[...]
If I read these correctly, this is exactly the kind of action that a
maintainer can take to make the release process smoother. If *you* as
a maintainer think the bug shouldn't be RC, by all means downgrade it
(ideally with an explanation just in case it's disputed later on).
I understand that...
But well, strictly speaking it *is* a data loss... If someone had a
terminal server and several users and has the file on a samba share this
potentially could still happen...
I just don't belive this is a reason to block LO on this.
Especially as it already was bullseye-ignore'd, so can't we just
bookworm-ignore it?
Regards,
Rene