On 02/10/22 at 04:23 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > Nǐmen hǎo! > I did another _source_ rebuild of the archive -- checking if every package > is capable of repacking its source. Ie, if you can unpack it, (possibly > modify), and pack again. > > Putting aside packages that are broken in other ways as well (B-Depends > non-installable, FTBFS or a RC bug), there seems to be no new fancy types > of breakage that haven't been fixed in 2020. > > This leaves one big set: packages that fail the clean step due to > undeclared B-Depends. According to the Policy: > > # "clean" > # Only the "Build-Depends" and "Build-Conflicts" fields must be > # satisfied when this target is invoked. > > ... which makes sense as you might be interested in only an arch:all or > arch:any build, and we have no clean-indep/clean-arch targets. > > For sbuild, the incantation is: > alias sbuild-source='sbuild -s --source-only-changes --no-arch-all > --no-arch-any --no-run-autopkgtest' > > As 291 packages fail this requirement, I'm posting here before (instead?) > filing bugs. There's also a question of severity. > > Raw list and dd-list attached.
All those source packages are Architecture: all. To make this easier to detect (and avoid regressions in the long term), I wonder if sbuild should have an option that would make it do, for a source+all build: - install B-D - run clean - install B-D-I - build the binary packages Lucas
