On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 9:29 PM Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues <jo...@debian.org> wrote: > To me it seems that we nearly are already at (2). The debootstrap bug #837060 > has a working patch and mmdebstrap exists that can do what is needed today. > Santiago did an archive rebuild to make sure our source package compile in a > chroot without Priority:required. > > Why do people call just accepting that Priority:required packages have to be > part of the buildd chroot the easier solution? We just need to fix debootstrap > bug #837060 and we are done, no? >
Yes, please fix debootstrap or anything else first, and ensure buildd uses the fixed version. If you can't convince the buildd to follow the policy, why should the individual package maintainers? -- Shengjing Zhu
