Hi, in daemon(1), I have a file with has two contradicting licenses in the same file. See https://salsa.debian.org/debian/daemon/-/blob/master/libslack/getopt.c
>From the wording of the second copyright notice, I think it is clear that that notice applies to the POD documentation included in the file while the actual code is LGPL. Upstream confirms that this is the intention and agrees that this is somehow suboptimally worded. Now, how do I write this in a DEP-5 copyright file? Having two stanzas for the same file gets flagged by Lintian as an Error, and the DEP-5 syntax doesn't seem to allow to mention two Licenses in the License: line. Any hints woule be appreciated. Greetings Marc -- -------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! ----- Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834
