Simon McVittie, le dim. 24 mars 2024 11:59:50 +0000, a ecrit: > On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 at 12:56:52 +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: > > 2. FTBFSing packages (those that block further work, anyway) > ... > > An example of a currently existing obstacle of this kind is snapd-glib > > (mainly because it blocks pipewire). > > For the specific example of pipewire, I've suggested temporarily > dropping that feature from pipewire on the affected architectures > <https://bugs.debian.org/1067558> which would get the rebuilds further > along (particularly if it unblocks weston, which lots of packages use > in their tests). There are various places where targeted changes like > this can unblock a whole tree of dependencies.
Could we use build profiles for this? That'd avoid full uploads, and document for architecture bootstrapping. Samuel