On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 at 07:40, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues <jo...@debian.org> wrote: [snip] > In summary: would running unstable instead of bookworm let me find more bugs > than running bookworm with unstable chroots? For my specific work: yes, > absolutely. Am I upgrading from bookworm to unstable or at least testing? > Absolutely not. I just don't have the amount of free-time this would require > of > me. Just performing the 12-13 bisection steps to find the offending kernel > commit which makes my system lock up would easily require a day of free time > from me. I'm afraid I do not have this luxury. Not even remotely close! > > So I'll continue to not dogfood as hard as I could and run as much from > bookworm as I can. Would it make me a better contributor if I ran unstable? > Certainly! But this thing is just a hobby of mine and I can only allot that > much time to do risky experiments with my only computer. I guess others are in > the same boat?
As long as we are all contributing our free time we just need to go the way it fits us better. I am an unstable user but I definitely respect and support your position. And I would hate losing contributors for things like this. -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer https://perezmeyer.com.ar/
