On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 01:03:04PM +1000, Russell Stuart wrote:
> On 1/4/24 10:18, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > % dpkg -S $(which mv > coreutils: /usr/bin/mv
> 
> On bookworm:
> 
>     $ dpkg -S $(which mv)
>     dpkg-query: no path found matching pattern /usr/bin/mv
> 
> This is caused by the /bin -> /usr/bin shift.
> 
> The reason I'm replying is after one, probably two decades this still
> annoys me:
> 
>    $ dpkg -S /etc/profile
>    dpkg-query: no path found matching pattern /etc/profile
> 
> It was put their by the Debian install, and I'm unlikely to change it.
> Its fairly important security wise.  It would be nice if "dpkg -S" told
> me base-files.deb installed it.  It would be nice if debsums told me if
> it changed.  There are lots of files like this, such as /etc/environment
> and /etc/hosts.  There are some directories like /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/
> which should only have files claimed by some .deb.
This is the reason I never expect dpkg -S to work and dpkg -L to be
correct. The (probably) oldest registered bug report about this is
#213907, from 2003.
RPM has %ghost since before that, of course.

-- 
WBR, wRAR

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to