On 2024-04-19 10:34:45 +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Sebastian Ramacher <sramac...@debian.org> writes:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > as the progress on the t64 transition is slowing down, I want to give an
> > overview of some of the remaining blockers that we need to tackle to get
> > it unstuck. I tried to identify some clusters of issues, but there might
> > be other classes of issues.
> 
> Thanks for update.  I haven't seen any response to my analysis of why
> 'shishi' shouldn't have t64-migrating, and lacking any response I
> eventually made an upload to revert the renaming.  I've raised an Ubuntu
> bug too since they haven't synced the updated package.  The Debian bug
> is now closed, so it wasn't included in your list, and maybe everything
> that can be hoped for is already achieved, but I wanted to mention as it
> ought to be on the t64 radar.

Thanks for letting us know. I'll exclude libshis{a,hi}0t64 in reruns of
my scripts. There are no reverse dependencies that need to be rebuilt,
so we only need to wait for the cruft to be removed from the archive.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Reply via email to