Dermot John Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I thought that a non-maintainer release was normally only done where > either a security hole needed to be fixed quickly or where a serious > problem existed with a package that the maintainer had not fixed for some > time.
The previous version was non-dfsg, while the current version is dfsg, this seems rather serious. Anyways, as maintainer, your release takes precedence. I'd enjoy that someone wants to help. [I hate to see eagerness get squashed, and that's what looks like what's happening here, in several directions.] -- Raul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
