>>>>> "Dan" == Dan Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dan> See, it's not "Is anyone going to?" or "Do we agree we Dan> should?" right now. It's "does anyone but Dan have the time Dan> to look at http://master.debian.org/~dan and figure out why Dan> the compiled libstdc++2.8 package whose source is there is Dan> missing a lot of important symbols". I can't figure it out. Ben> The source in http://master.debian.org/~dan in the libstdc Ben> sir is for 2.9. Could this be the problem? Dan> I present Dan> http://master.debian.org/~dan/libstdc/libstdc++_2.90.29-1.dsc Dan> for your enjoyment... Dan> Notice it says Binary: libstdc++2.8. Wow. How does 2.90 compile out to become 2.8? -- Brought to you by the letters U and N and the number 8. "Frungy! Frungy! Frungy!!" -- ZokFotPik, SCII Debian GNU/Linux -- where do you want to go tomorrow? http://www.debian.org/ I'm on FurryMUCK as Che, and EFNet and YiffNet IRC as Che_Fox.