On 21 January 2022 at 07:19, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: | Because I'm skeptical of fads. TileDB is the latest shiny new thing | which hasn't been time tested yet and proven to last.
Beg to differ, and think you will come around. Time will tell. | As said before I don't use TileDB, and no users have expressed a need | for it either. So there is no popular demand to get this support added | as soon as possible. It's circular. My colleague do all demos etc in Conda because it's builds there. | > | GDAL 3.5 and PDAL 2.4 might a good time to add tiledb support. | > | > What timeline do you expect here? | | https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/milestone/27 | https://github.com/PDAL/PDAL/milestone/21 Thanks for those links. That looks fine. Best, Dirk -- https://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
